KONFERENCIA-ELŐADÁS
China Is a Different Universe, Where Time Is Measured in Minutes, Not Decades
2026-11-26 11:35–11:50
Szerzők és előadók
Szekció és helyszín
MI, Kína és az algoritmikus társadalom
2026. november 26., csütörtök · 11:30–12:45
107-es terem, Szentkirályi utca 28.
Teljes, beküldött absztrakt
Artificial intelligence and robotics are reshaping China with exceptional speed and scale. This presentation examines this transformation as a technological, economic, social and cultural process. It asks how AI is changing industrial production, everyday life, education, creative practices and national self-understanding in a country where research, prototyping, deployment and social adaptation follow one another at extraordinary pace. The global AI race is shaped by three distinct development models. The United States continues to lead frontier innovation, yet its ecosystem is increasingly dominated by a small number of technology giants, unprecedented concentrations of capital and what Yanis Varoufakis describes as technofeudalism. Europe has built a sophisticated regulatory framework, but often approaches AI through the language of risk, protection and institutional caution. China has created a coordinated system in which technology hubs, state investment, universities, industrial policy and highly competitive private companies reinforce one another. The strength of this model lies in broad deployment. AI is embedded across manufacturing, logistics, healthcare, education, urban management, scientific research, finance and everyday consumer life. Data is treated as a factor of production, while AI increasingly functions as national infrastructure. Shanghai offers a dense example: more than a thousand AI companies, specialized industrial parks, leading universities and public investment programmes designed to accelerate technology transfer and industrial scaling. China’s ambitions extend well beyond domestic modernization. Beijing seeks to influence global AI governance, promotes token-based financial initiatives, supports the overseas expansion of AI and robotics companies, and invests heavily in international academic cooperation. Technological development has become closely integrated with diplomacy, industrial policy and geopolitical strategy. The social effects are already visible. Automation and AI-driven restructuring create new tensions around work, education and social mobility. Graduate unemployment has become a major policy challenge, while new forms of AI-related labour are emerging, from data annotation to embodied AI training. The image of recent graduates solving Rubik’s Cubes to generate training data for robotic systems captures both the ingenuity and the contradictions of this transformation. China’s AI revolution is equally cultural. Intense educational competition, sophisticated collaborative habits, openness to technological experimentation and a rapidly expanding entrepreneurial culture create fertile conditions for adoption. AI is visible not only in laboratories and factories, but also in everyday digital culture: WeChat stickers, short-video platforms, AI film festivals and new forms of creative expression. In the West, narratives surrounding China are also shifting, with earlier suspicion increasingly accompanied by fascination, reflected in phenomena such as Chinamaxxing. Drawing on field research conducted during 2026 in Chinese universities, AI laboratories, technology companies and innovation hubs, this presentation argues that China’s competitive advantage lies in its ability to connect governance, industry, education, finance, culture and technology into a system that shortens technological cycles and scales innovation with remarkable speed. The historical implications extend beyond China itself. In the nineteenth century, China failed to recognize the strategic significance of the Industrial Revolution. The consequences were military defeat, unequal treaties and more than a century of national humiliation. Europe today faces a different, yet comparable, strategic moment. If artificial intelligence is approached primarily as a regulatory challenge rather than as a civilizational transformation, Europe risks gradually losing its capacity to shape the future. It may remain one of the world’s richest and most culturally significant regions, yet increasingly resemble a museum of past achievements rather than one of the principal architects of the technological age.
